LUCKY BISHAL REPRESENTED THROUGH NATURAL GUARDIAN FATHER ANUP BISHAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.Rev./576/2026 · 2026-06-29
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18317 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18317 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:18823) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Revision No. 576 of 2026
---
Lucky Bishal
--- Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand
--- --- Opp. Party --- CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Birendra Kumar, Adv. For the State
: A.P.P.
--- 02/29.06.2026 Heard Mr. Birendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P.
2. This application is directed against the order dated 30.04.2026 passed by the learned Special Judge, Children Court, Dhanbad in Criminal Appeal No. 92/2026 whereby and whereunder the order dated 13.04.2026 passed by the learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Dhanbad in connection with Rajganj P.S. Case No. 80/2025 rejecting the prayer for bail of the petitioner has been affirmed. 3. It has been alleged that the informant was repeatedly called on his mobile and messages were sent on Whatsapp demanding extortion money of Rs.50 Lakh. The manager of the petrol pump was also shot at by the miscreants. 4. Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been implicated on the confessional statement of co-accused Ashish Kumar Singh who has already been granted bail in B.A. No.798 of 2026. It has further been submitted that so far as the antecedents of the petitioner are concerned, he has one criminal antecedent in which he has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Revision No.473 of 2026. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is in probation home since 21.11.2025. He adds that several of the other co- accused persons have also been granted bail in B.A. No.1947/2026 and 1979/2026. 5. Learned A.P.P has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 2
6.
Regard being had to the manner of implication of the petitioner and the period of custody undergone by him, while setting aside the order dated 30.04.2026 passed by the learned Special Judge, Children Court, Dhanbad in Criminal Appeal No. 92/2026 and the order dated 13.04.2026 passed by the learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Dhanbad in connection with Rajganj P.S. Case No. 80/2025, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Dhanbad in connection with Rajganj P.S. Case No. 80/2025, subject to the condition that the father of the petitioner shall ensure the safe keep of the petitioner and shall further ensure that the petitioner does not mix with any antisocial elements. 7. This revision application stands allowed. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) Dated : 29 /06/2026 Shamim/ Uploaded on : 01/07/2026