DHARMENDRA ALIAS DHARMENDRA CHAUDHARY v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5884/2026 · 2026-06-29
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18315 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18315 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[ 2026:JHHC:18918 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5884 of 2026
Dharmendra @ Dharmendra Chaudhary aged about 22 Years son of Upendra Chaudhary, resident of Village Basodih Post office & Police Station Satgawa, District Koderma Jharkhand.
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. Party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Manish Yadav, Adv. For the State : Mr. Someshwar Roy , Addl. PP
02 / 29.06.2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Korrah P.S. case no. 82/2026 instituted under Section 292/296/318(4)/338/336(3)/61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and under sections 3/4/5 of Immoral Trafficking Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in criminal conspiracy with the co-accused persons, was involved in immoral trafficking of women. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and the main allegation is against Manoj Kumar and Sudhir Kumar and the only allegation against the petitioner is that he was also found present at the time of occurrence, when the raid was conducted by police. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 20/05/2026, as mentioned in para 1 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co- operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the
case in any manner during trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Hazaribagh in connection with Korrah P.S. case no. 82/2026 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Dated 29.06.2026
Smita/-