Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18312 (CHH)

RUPESH KUMAR PAL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2680/2026 · 2026-03-22

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:13630 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2680 of 2026 • Rupesh Kumar Pal, S/o Late Mohanlal Pal, Aged About 43 Years, Currently Posted As Assistant Engineer, Chhattisgarh Rural Road Development Agency Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Its Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Additional Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Chief Engineer Officer, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Nava Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Collector Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. P. Chetan Kumar, Advocate. For State/Respondents : Ms. Shailja Shukla, G.A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order on Board 23/03/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to stay and quash the effect and operation of the Transfer order dated 11.03.2026 issued by respondent authorities; 10.2 Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in favour of the petitioner as per the facts and circumstances of the present case, in the ends of justice. ” DEEPTI JHA Digitally signed by DEEPTI JHA 2 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner is holding the post of Assistant Engineer and posted at Chhattisgarh Rural Road Development Agency Raipur (C.G.). Vide order dated 11.03.2026 (Annexure-P/1), he has been transferred to Bijapur. He further contended that mother of the petitioner is an old age person and is suffering from mental disease, for which, she is taking treatment at Nagpur and petitioner is the only son to take care of his mother and taking her to Nagpur for treatment. He further contended that his child is studying in Nursery class, whose exams are going to be held from 6th April, 2026 to 15th April, 2026. Petitioner has submitted representation dated 12.03.2026 before the respondent authorities, which is pending consideration, therefore, direction be issued to respondent authorities to consider and take decision on pending representation at the earliest within specified time frame. 3. Learned counsel for State submits that under the Transfer Policy, a committee is constituted to consider grievance of an employee against transfer. Petitioner has not submitted any representation before the committee constituted under the Transfer Policy. If, petitioner submits representation before the committee, then the same will be considered and decided in accordance with law. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will submit representation before the committee constituted under the Transfer Policy. 5. On due consideration of the submission of learned counsel for the respective parties, nature of grievance raised, this writ petition is disposed of permitting petitioner to submit representation before the committee constituted under the Transfer Policy within a period of 1 week and thereafter, the concerned committee shall consider and take decision on the representation within a further period of 2 weeks. 3 6. It is further directed that till decision is taken on the representation, ‘status quo’ , as it exists today with respect to place of posting of petitioner shall be maintained by the parties. Interim order shall remain operative, subject to petitioner submitting representation within a period of 1 week. 7. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with aforesaid observations and directions. Certified copy as per rules Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Deepti Jha