DINESH KUMAR SON OF SHRI RAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/12747/2022 · 2026-01-22
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18303 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18303 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:2902] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12747/2022
1. Dinesh Kumar Son Of Shri Ran Singh, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of Narwasi, Tehsil Rajagarh, District Churu (Raj.)
2. Moti Singh Goswami Son Of Gugan Gir Goswami, Aged About 51 Years, Resident Of Vpo- Kanjan, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Churu (Raj.)
3. Jogendra Singh Son Of Shri Jagannath Singh, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Vpo-Bharli, Tehsil Basedi, District Dholpur (Raj.)
4. Devendra Singh Son Of Lakhan Singh, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Vpo-Khindora, Tehsil Basedi, District Dholpur (Raj.)
5. Piyush Panchal Son Of Dinesh Panchal, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of Toda Raisingh, Near Hadi Rani Kund, Rebaree Baba Ka Chowk, Tehsil Toda Raisingh, District Tonk (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. Secretariat Jaipur.
2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Dholpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.K. Gouttam Mr. G.S. Gouttam Ms. Arati Bai Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Dheeraj Tripathi, Dy. GC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 22/01/2026
1. The instant writ petition is filed by the petitioners with following prayer:-
[2026:RJ-JP:2902] (2 of 3) [CW-12747/2022]
“It is therefore, most humbly prayed that your Lordship may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and call for and examine entire record of the case and by an appropriate writ, order and direction: i) That the respondent may kindly be directed to be given the notional and other service benefits to the petitioners from the year 2013 when the some candidates/junior/less meritorious to them were accorded appointment in the year 2013 under the LDC recruitment 2013. iii) Any other order which this Hon’ble Court deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioners.
2. Considered submission of learned counsel for petitioners, issue notice to respondents.
3. Mr. Dheeraj Tripathi, Dy. GC accepts notice for the respondents.
4. Office is directed to reflect the name of Mr. Dheeraj Tripathi, Dy. GC as counsel for respondents.
5.
Learned counsel for petitioner is directed to serve a copy of petition to learned counsel for respondents.
6. Having considered the submission of learned counsel for the parties and also considering the order dated 08.08.2025 in SB CWP No.11564/2024 titled as Premchand Mehar and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court and Nand Kishore and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.:- S.B. CWP No.12109/2018, it is appropriate to dispose of the writ petition in following terms:
[2026:RJ-JP:2902] (3 of 3) [CW-12747/2022] (1) The petitioners are at liberty to file representation(s) with the respondents for redressal of their grievance(s) within a period of four weeks from today. (2) The respondents shall pass a reasoned and speaking order thereon within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt taking into consideration the order/judment of this Court dated 18.07.2018 passed in the case of Nand Kishore Sharma (supra) with communication of the decision to them. (3) If the petitioners are found eligible and entitled for grant of notional and other service benefits as paid to the similarly situated employees, the compliance shall be made within a period of 8 weeks from the date of taking the decision.
7. Instant writ petition, with misc. application, if any, stand
disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/25