Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 183 (CHH)

AMAR PAL SINGH v. HARDEEP SINGH Rajpal

MCC/269/2026 · 2026-03-17

Shri Sachin Singh Rajput

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:12937 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 269 of 2026 1 - Amar Pal Singh S/o Late Shri Rajendra Singh Aged About 41 Years Caste Sikkha, R/o Itwari Bazar Rani Road, Korba, Tahsil And Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant versus 1 - Hardeep Singh Rajpal S/o Preetam Singh Rajpal Aged About 61 Years Caste Sikkh, R/o Rani Road, Korba, Tahsil And Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh. 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Korba, Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Smt. Paramjeet Kaur W/o Late Rajendra Singh Aged About 71 Years Caste Sikkh, R/o Beside Santoshi Saari, Rani Road, Korba, Tahsil And Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Smt. Hardeep Kaur D/o Late Rajendra Singh Aged About 50 Years Caste Sikkh, R/o Beside Santoshi Saari, Rani Road, Korba, Tahsil And Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Sumit Rajpal S/o Late Rajendra Singh Aged About 42 Years Caste Sikkh, R/o Beside Santoshi Saari, Rani Road, Korba, Tahsil And Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Smt. Daljeet Kaur Chwla W/o Lucky Chawla Aged About 45 Years Caste Sikkh, R/o Futna Oil, Near Bhairav Mandir, Kampati, Nagpur, Distt. Nagpur, Maharastra. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from CIS) For Applicant : Mr. Aakash Aahuja, Advocate For State/Respondent No.2 : Ms. Deepeshwari Mahilwar, P.L. RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2026.03.18 18:09:58 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput Order on Board 18/03/2026 1. This MCC has been filed for restoration of WP227 No.110 of 2026 which was dismissed vide Registry note dated 12.02.2026 in pursuance of peremptory order dated 29.01.2026. 2. Learned counsel for applicant/claimant prayed that applicant is not aware of judicial procedure, therefore, WP227 No.110 of 2026 be restored to its original number, as the same was dismissed vide Registry note dated 12.02.2026 in pursuance of peremptory order dated 29.01.2026. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent No.2/State not opposed the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the applicant. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the material available on record. 5. Having considered the grounds mentioned in restoration application, in the interest of justice, MCC No.269/2026 filed for restoration of WP227 No.110 of 2026 (Amar Pal Singh vs. Hardeep Singh Rajpal & Others) is allowed. 6. Accordingly, the Registry is directed to restore WP227 No.110 of 2026 to its original number. No order as to costs. Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge Ravi Mandavi