SHYAM KUMAR ALIAS SHYAM KUMAR SAH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5886/2026 · 2026-06-29
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18298 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18298 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[ 2026:JHHC:18919] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5886 of 2026
Shyam Kumar @ Shyam Kumar Sah, aged about 30 years, Son of Parkash Sah, Resident of Village-Jan Mohammadpur, Post + P.S.-Kahalgaunw, District-Bhagalpur, Bihar.
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. Party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kr. Sah, Adv. For the State : Mr. Vijoy Kr. Sinha, Addl. PP
02 / 29.06.2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Pathargama P.S. Case No.13 of 2026 (ST. Case No. 150/2026 ) instituted under Section 85, 109, 61 (2), 118(2),351(2), 352, of B.N.S., 2023 & Section 3/4 of dowry Prohibition Act & Section 27 of Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in criminal conspiracy of the co-accused persons, attempted to murder the informant. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and the petitioner is not named in the FIR and there is no allegation against the petitioner of firing upon the victim. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 19 of the bail application and except confessional statement of the co-accused, there is no other material in the record to implicate the petitioner in this case. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 21.01.2026 , as mentioned in para 22 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned
counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case, hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Additional Sessions Judge-II, Godda in connection with Pathargama P.S. Case No.13 of 2026 (ST. Case No. 150/2026 ) with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Dated 29.06.2026
Smita/-