SHIV GYAN DEVELOPERS PVT LTD ANDANR v. STATE OF RAJ AND ORS
CW/18354/2015 · 2026-01-16
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18295 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18295 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18353/2015
1. Shivgyan Developers Pvt. Ltd. a Company registered under Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at Plot No. 16, Govind Marg, Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur through its Director Shri Vinod Sawalka.
2. Umang Sawalka S/o Shri Suresh Bajranglal Sawalka, Aged About 27 years, R/o Flat No. 807, Shiv Gyan Enclave, Gautam Marg, Nirman Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. The Principal Secretary, Urban Development & Housing Department, Govt. of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. Jaipur Development Authority through its Secretary, Ramkishore Vyas Bhawan, JLN Marg, Jaipur (Raj.)
4. The District Collector, Jaipur (Raj.)
5. The Dy. Commissioner, Zone-4, Jaipur Development Authority, Ramkishore Vyas Bhawan, JLN Marg, Jaipur Raj.
6. The Enforcement Officer, Zone-4, Jaipur Development Authority, Ramkishore Vyas Bhawan, JLN Marg, Jaipur Raj.
7. The Commissioner of Police, Commissionerate, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18354/2015
1. Shivgyan Developers Pvt. Ltd. a company registered under Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at Plot No. 16, Govind Marg, Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur through its Director Shri Vinod Sawalka..
2. Vinod Sawalka S/o Late Shri Bajrang Lal Sawalka, Aged About 58 years, R/o Flat No. 806-807, Shiv Gyan Enclave, Gautam Marg, Nirman Nagar, Jaipur Raj. ----Petitioners
(2 of 3) [CW-18353/2015] Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. The Principal Secretary, Urban Development & Housing Department, Govt. of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. Jaipur Development Authority through its Secretary, Ramkishore Vyas Bhawan, JLN Marg, Jaipur (Raj.)
4. The District Collector, Jaipur (Raj.)
5. The Dy. Commissioner, Zone-4, Jaipur Development Authority, Ramkishore Vyas Bhawan, JLN Marg, Jaipur (Raj.)
6. The Enforcement Officer, Zone-4, Jaipur Development Authority, Ramkishore Vyas Bhawan, Jln Marg, Jaipur (Raj.)
7. The Commissioner of Police, Commissionerate, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Sandeep Pathak For Respondent(s) : Mr.Jeetendra Kumar Sharma JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 16/01/2026
1. It has been apprised at the Bar that some order was passed by the Jaipur Development Authority for eviction of the petitioners’ building. Thereafter, the petitioners approached this Court by way of filing the instant writ petitions and subsequently, interim orders were passed in favour of the petitioners and in the meantime, construction was completed.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that as per the instructions now, the JDA has taken a decision to withdraw the impugned orders. Counsel submits that some time be granted to
(3 of 3) [CW-18353/2015] the petitioners to place the documents in this regard on the record, hence, the case be deferred for some other day.
3. Looking to the fact that the Jaipur Development Authority has taken a decision not to take any action against the petitioners and in the opinion of this Court, no cause of action survives with the petitioners to continue with these petitions and with the passage of time, these petitions have become infrcutuous.
4. The instant writ petitions stand dismissed as having become infructuous. All pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
5. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to move an application for revival of these petitions and recall of this order, in case, any cause of action/ grievance still survives.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma/8-9