Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[ 2026:JHHC:19000] -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 3490 of 2026
Ilyas Ansari, aged about 25 years, Son of Abdul Rashid Ansari, Resident of Kouwakhap, P.O. Henjla, P.S. Kuru, District Lohardaga.
..... … Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
..... … Opposite Party
--------
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Md. Razaullah Ansari, Advocate. For the State
: Mr. Sardhu Mahto, A.P.P. ------ 03/ 30.06.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Lohardaga P.S. Case No. 47 of 2025, registered for the offence under Section 304(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lohardaga.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that false allegations are made against this petitioner of snatching the mobile phone of the informant. He submits that there are general and omnibus allegations against him. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be provided to the petitioner.
4.
Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that there is direct allegation against the petitioner of snatching the mobile phone and even the said mobile phone has been recovered from the house of this petitioner and further the petitioner is having two criminal antecedents. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected.
5.
Considering that even the snatched mobile phone has been
[ 2026:JHHC:19000] -2-
recovered from the house of this petitioner and further he is having two criminal antecedents and in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-30.06.2026 Amitesh/-