APHC010107192026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 5802/2026 Between: 1. SMT. VELAGA UMA, W/O. VELAGA RAMANA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC HOUSEHOLD DUTIES, R/O. DOOR NO.3-6, ATCHARLA VILLAGE, KASIMKOTA MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. PRESENTLY RESIDING AT SRI SAI MEDHA PURE FUELS, D BLOCK, TUNGLAM ROAD, AUTONAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522237. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT- 531001. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KASIMKOTA POLICE STATION, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT- 531031. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, KASIMKOTA MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT- 531031. 5. NIMMADALA BABU RAO, S/O. (LATE) VENKATA RAMANA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O. KOTTURU VILLAGE, ANAKAPALLI MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT- 531001 ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.5802 of 2026 Dated 09.03.2026 Counsel for the Petitioner: V V SATISH Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “…to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No. 2 to 4 in harassing the petitioner by calling her to their office and thereby resorting to settle civil dispute and threatening that they would addressing letters to the Registration Office for cancelation of sale deed is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and to consequently direct the respondents No. 2 to 4 not to interfere life and liberty and property of the petitioner and her family members to settle civil disputes and to pass….” 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government. 3. Sri V. V. Satish, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 are calling the petitioner to the police station, harassing her to settle the civil dispute, and threatening to address a letter to the Registration Office for cancellation of the sale deed. 4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that the petitioner, along with her husband and son, lent a sum of Rs. 7,72,000/- through a bank account and Rs. 3,00,000/- in 3 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.5802 of 2026 Dated 09.03.2026 cash to one Nimmadala Baburao for his daughter’s marriage, and later demanded an amount of Rs. 32,00,000/-. Hence, he paid Rs. 5,80,000/- to them and stated that he would pay the remaining amount and cancel the registration. However, alleging that they attempted to grab his land, he further stated that they threatened to beat and kill him, and therefore requested necessary action. When the police summoned the petitioner’s son to the police station and conducted an enquiry, they found that the dispute is purely civil in nature. Except for the said enquiry, they have not called the petitioner. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and recording the submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 not to call the petitioner to the police station henceforth, at the behest of Nimmadala Baburao, in connection with the loan transaction. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 09.03.2026 PBS 4 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.5802 of 2026 Dated 09.03.2026 257 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 5802 of 2026 Date: 09.03.2026 PBS