Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18051 RFA No. 696 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 696 OF 2026 (PAR) BETWEEN:
SRI. ANJANAPPA S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCCUPATION: NIL, R/AT GOWDAHALLI COLONY, SHIVANAPURA POST, DASARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT PIN CODE NO.570091. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. HANUMANTHAPPA HARAVI GOWDAR, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SMT.JAYAMMA W/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, PIN CODE NO.562125 OCCUPATION: NIL
2.
NARASIMHA MURTHY S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCCUPATION: NIL
3. VISHWANATH S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCCUPATION: NIL
Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18051 RFA No. 696 of 2026
RESPONDENTS NOS.1 TO 3 ARE R/AT HOUSE CONSTRUCTED AT SITE NO.8, OF JANARA COLONY, ANDHRAHALLI VILLAGE, VISHWANEEDAM POST, YESHAVANATHAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, NOW BENGALURU-560091.
4. YELLAPPA S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCCUPATION: NIL R/AT NO.12/1, 3RD CROSS, JAYARAMA STREET, KAMMANAHALLI MAIN ROAD, R.S.PALYA, MS NAGARA, BENGALURU-560038. …RESPONDENTS
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.11.2025 PASSED IN OS.NO.1320/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18051 RFA No. 696 of 2026
ORAL JUDGMENT This is an appeal that arises out of a judgment and decree for partition. It is stated in the valuation slip that the total value of the property is Rs.10,00,000/- and the plaintiff's share works out to Rs.5,00,000/-.
2. In view of Section 19(1) of the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964, the appeal is to be tried by the District Court. Hence, the office is directed to return the appeal papers to the appellant and the appellant is permitted to present the same before the appropriate District Court.
3. For statistical purposes, this appeal is treated as closed in this Court.
Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE
BKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11