2026:JHHC:6331 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 12115 of 2025 ----- Abdul Kadir Ansari @ Kadir Miyan, S/o Alim Miyan, R/o Village- Phulpahari, P.O. Surajbera, P.S. Littipara, District Pakur .... Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party(s). ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Saket Kumar, AddI. P.P. …...... 03/ 10.03.2026: This bail application has been filed under Sections 483 & 484 of BNSS, 2023 wherein, prayer has been made for grant of bail as he is in custody for allegedly committing offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(2), 109(1), 74 and 352 of B.N.S. 2. Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner learned counsel for the State and have also gone through the impugned order. 3. Learned AddI. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. 4. The brief of prosecution case as per the FIR is that on the day of incident, maternal grand-daughter of the informant was cleaning utensils in the street of his house. In the meantime, petitioner along with others started abusing her and when nephew of informant, namely, Yunus Ansari and Naimuddin Ansari asked them as to why they are abusing a child, then all the accused persons duly armed with lathi, danda, iron rod and sharp-edged sword reached there and spread chili powder in both the eyes of his nephew and stated assaulting them. They also attacked the other family members, who came to rescue them. 5. From the FIR and the case diary, I find that there is direct and specific allegation against the petitioner. It is alleged that the petitioner assaulted Yunus Ansari on the head with an iron rod, due to which he fell unconscious. He also assaulted Naimuddin Ansari with a sword on his ear which resulted a cut on the ear. Further, Yunus Ansari and Naimuddin Ansari, who are the injured witnesses supported the prosecution’s case in the case diary and injury reports also corroborate the above allegation. 6. Considering the aforesaid fact and the statement of the injured witnesses at this stage, I am not inclined to grant privilege of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Littipara P.S. Case No.25 of 2025, pending in the Court of learned A.C.J.M., Pakur, stands rejected. 7`. Accordingly, the instant bail application stands dismissed. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 10th March, 2026 R.S./ Uploaded on12/03/2026