HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 4858 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Declaration made in paragraph 46 of writ petition is not correct since admittedly petitioner can file an appeal under the relevant provisions against the impugned order, therefore, ignoring the aforesaid incorrect declaration, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail alternative remedy. May 6, 2026 SB Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajnish Kumar Srivastava, Siddharth Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Satyendra Nath Tripathi (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Ripunjay Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad