Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18280 (JHR)

SUBHASH CHANDRA BHAGAT v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.Rev./894/2024 · 2026-06-29

Rongon Mukhopadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation 2026:JHHC:18811 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Rev. No. 894 of 2024 Subhash Chandra Bhagat, S/o Ram Chandra Bhagat R/o Mangalam, Adarsh Nagar, Booty Road, P.O.-RMCH, P.S.- Sadar, Dist.- Ranchi. --- --- Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Chitra Kumari, W/o Dr. Jay Prakash Bhagat, R/o Mangalam, Adarsh Nagar, Booty Road, P.O.-RMCH, P.S.- Sadar, Dist.- Ranchi. --- --- Opposite Parties --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. R.P. Gupta, Adv. For the State : A.P.P. For the O.P. no. 2 : Mr. A.K. Sahani, Adv. --- 05/29.06.2026 Heard Mr. R.P. Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. as well as Mr. A.K. Sahani, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no. 2. This application has been preferred by the petitioner for condoning a delay of 720 days in filing the revision application. Submission has been advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was not aware that his application for discharge has been rejected and only when the evidence started, his lawyer had advised the petitioner to move this Court in revision against the order dated 13.05.2022 consequent to which the present revision application has been filed. Mr. A.K. Sahani, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 has submitted that the evidence has already been completed and the case has been fixed for argument. There does not appear to be sufficient reasons for condoning a huge delay of 720 days and, in fact, the reasons which has been assigned in the para 2 and 3 of the instant application are vague and unsubstantiated. Neutral Citation 2026:JHHC:18811 On consideration of the aforesaid facts, I do not feel inclined to condone the delay of 720 days in filing the revision application and consequently, I.A. No. 7935 of 2024 stands dismissed. As a result of I.A. No. 7935 of 2024 having been dismissed, Cr. Rev. No. 894 of 2024 also stands dismissed. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) Dated- 29th June, 2026. Preet/- Uploaded on: 01 /07/2026.