Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18279 (RAJ)

RAMSWAROOP GURJAR S/O BADRI NARAYAN GURJAR v. RAJASTHAN TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

CW/11686/2025 · 2026-01-20

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:2745] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11686/2025 Ramswaroop Gurjar S/o Badri Narayan Gurjar, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of 37 Manu Vihar, Keshav Vidhyapeeth, Jamdoli, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan Tourism Development Corporation, Through Its Chairman, Having Its Office At Paryatan Bhawan, 3Rd Floor, Opposite Vidhayakpuri Police Station, M.i. Road, Jaipur. 2. Rajasthan Tourism Development Corporation, Through Its Managing Director, Having Its Office At Paryatan Bhawan, 3Rd Floor, Opposite Vidhayakpuri Police Station, M.i. Road, Jaipur. 3. Rajasthan Tourism Development Corporation, Through Its Executive Director, Having Its Office At Paryatan Bhawan, 3Rd Floor, Opposite Vidhayakpuri Police Station, M.i. Road, Jaipur. 4. Ramswaroop Yadav S/o Shri Kanaram Yadav, Aged About 52 Years, Presently Posted At Paryatan Bhawan, In Front Of Vidhayakpuri Thana, Mi Road, Jaipur. 5. Subhash Sharma S/o Shri Madan Lal Sharma, Aged About 53 Years, Presently Posted At Hotel Teej, Collectorate Circle, Banipark, Jaipur. 6. Devendra Saroj S/o Shriram Saroj, Aged About 45 Years, Presently Posted At Paryatan Bhawan, In Front Of Vidhayakpuri Thana, Mi Road, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhimanyu Singh For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 20/01/2026 [2026:RJ-JP:2745] (2 of 3) [CW-11686/2025] 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- i) The respondent no. 1 to 3 may kindly be directed to redraw the seniority list of House Assistant by placing the name of petitioner at proper place as per his seniority. ii) The impugned office order dated 28.04.2025 may kindly be modified and respondent No.1 to 3 may kindly be directed to give promotion to the petitioner on the post of Assistant Manager by including his name in the office order dated 28.04.2025 above the private respondents, with consequential benefits. 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. [2026:RJ-JP:2745] (3 of 3) [CW-11686/2025] 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /230