Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25432-DB RFA No. 67 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.67 OF 2025 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
SRI SIDHARTH P S/O SRI PRATHAP P, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/AT SLR COMFORTS, FLAT NO.307, B BLOCK, 3RD FLOOR, NEAR ADITHYA BAKERY, GANAKALLU VILLAGE, CHANNASANDRA, KENGERI, UTTARAHALLI MAIN ROAD, RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 098 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. GIRISH C. S., ADV.) AND:
SRI PRATHAP P S/O LATE SRI O. PRABHAKARAN, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT SLR COMFORTS, FLAT NO.307, B BLOCK, 3RD FLOOR, NEAR ADITHYA BAKERY, GANAKALLU VILLAGE, CHANNASANDRA,
Digitally signed by RAKSHA Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25432-DB RFA No. 67 of 2025
KENGERI UTTARAHALLI MAIN ROAD, RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR, BENGALURU-560098
ALSO AT:
SRI PRATHAP P.
C/O SRI JAYAPRAKASH P, S/O LATE SRI O PRABHAKARAN, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT FLAT NO.302, MAHAVEER HOMES, KENGERI UPANAGAR, 3RD BLOCK, BANDEMATTA ROAD, BENGALURU-560060 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. PARAMESWARAPPA C., ADV.)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 R/W ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC, 1908, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 20.08.2024 PASSED ON IA NO. 1/24 IN OS NO.2897/2023 ON THE FILE OF XLI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-42), ALLOWING THE IA NO.1/24 FILED U/O VII RULE 11(a) AND (d) OF CPC FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25432-DB RFA No. 67 of 2025
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)
The learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. A memo has been filed to that effect stating that the parties to the above appeal have amicably settled the dispute among themselves outside the Court. In view of the said settlement, the appellant does not wish to prosecute the above appeal.
2. In view of the memo, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE
Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE
RAK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29