IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 10388 of 202 4 Decided on: 31.07 .2026 Rinku and another … Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ___________________________________________________________________ For the petitioners : Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rahul Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for respondents- State. : Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that at this stage, the petitioners shall be satisfied, in case, this petition is disposed of with direction to the authority to decide the representations filed by the petitioners, which are appended with the petition as Annexure P-4 (colly.) within some time bound period. 2. Accordingly, as prayed for, without adjudication on merit of the case, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representations (Annexure P-4 colly.) field by the petitioners, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein, within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 31 , 2026 (narender)