Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18273 (AP)

The Depot Manager v. Shaik Saibaba

WA/302/2026 · 2026-03-17

Lisa Gill, Ninala Jayasurya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010108422026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX WRIT APPEAL NO: 302/2026 Between: 1. THE DEPOT MANAGER,, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CORPORATION LTD, IMFL DEPOT, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT. 1. SHAIK SAIBABA, S/O SHAIK PEDA BUDE SAHIB, AGED .ABOUT 39 YEARS,OCC. OUTSOURCING EMPLOYEE, R/O2 VILLAGE, ROMPICHERLA MANDAL,PALNADU DISTRICT. 2. ANDHRA PRADESH STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION LTD APSBCL, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE COMPLEX, IHC CORPORATE, MANGALAGIRI, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR 3. GENERAL MANAGER ADMINISTRATION, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION LTD. (APSBCL) 1ST FLOOR, PROHIBITION AND EXCISES COMPLEX, IHC CORPORATE, MANGALAGIRI. 4. IMFL DEPOT, NARASARAOPET, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION LTD., NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER (RESPONDENTS NOS 2 AND 4 NOT NECESSARY PARTIES) CORAM:- THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX WRIT APPEAL NO: 302/2026 THE DEPOT MANAGER,, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CORPORATION LTD, IMFL DEPOT, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU ...APPELLANT AND SHAIK SAIBABA, S/O SHAIK PEDA BUDE SAHIB, AGED .ABOUT 39 YEARS,OCC. OUTSOURCING EMPLOYEE, R/O2-48, GOGULAPADU VILLAGE, ROMPICHERLA MANDAL,PALNADU DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION LTD APSBCL, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE COMPLEX, IHC CORPORATE, MANGALAGIRI, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR GENERAL MANAGER ADMINISTRATION, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION LTD. (APSBCL) 1ST FLOOR, PROHIBITION AND EXCISES COMPLEX, IHC CORPORATE, IMFL DEPOT, NARASARAOPET, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION LTD., NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER (RESPONDENTS NOS 2 AND 4 NOT NECESSARY PARTIES) ...RESPONDENT(S): THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3575] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH THE DEPOT MANAGER,, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION LTD, IMFL DEPOT, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU ...APPELLANT SHAIK SAIBABA, S/O SHAIK PEDA BUDE SAHIB, AGED .ABOUT 39 48, GOGULAPADU VILLAGE, ROMPICHERLA MANDAL,PALNADU DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION LTD APSBCL, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE COMPLEX, IHC CORPORATE, GENERAL MANAGER ADMINISTRATION, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION LTD. (APSBCL) 1ST FLOOR, PROHIBITION AND EXCISES COMPLEX, IHC CORPORATE, IMFL DEPOT, NARASARAOPET, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION LTD., NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER (RESPONDENTS ...RESPONDENT(S): THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA W.A No.302 of 2026 -2- Present:- Mr. V.Srinivasula Reddy, Advocate for appellant. Mr. Sasanka Bhuvanagiri, Advocate for respondent No.1. *** LISA GILL,J. Prayer in this appeal is for setting aside order dated 09.12.2025 passed by learned Single Bench in W.P No.33443 of 2025, whereby the writ petition has been disposed of while directing respondents therein that is the present appellant to continue with the services of petitioner/respondent No.1 and to ensure that services of petitioner/respondent No.1 are not disturbed. This order has been passed on the basis of submission made by learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 4, as recorded in para No.4 of the impugned order dated 09.12.2025. 2. Learned counsel for appellant submits that such a statement was in fact not made by learned counsel, who in effect had denied all allegations in the writ petition. 3. Keeping in view the specific plea raised by learned counsel for appellant as above, when faced with the query whether this aspect had been brought to notice of learned Single Bench, learned counsel for appellant seeks to withdraw this appeal with liberty to file a review application. 4. Writ appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforementioned. In case of an order adverse to the appellant, they are at W.A No.302 of 2026 -3- liberty to avail the remedies as available in accordance with law. No order as to cost. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of accordingly. (LISA GILL) JUDGE (NINALA JAYASURYA) JUDGE Date:18.03.2026 MDP