BHAWANI SHANKAR S/O BHANWAR LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CCP/708/2022 · 2026-02-05
Anil Kumar Upman, Sudesh Bansal
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18272 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18272 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:5475-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 708/2022 In D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.10016/2020 Bhawani Shankar S/o Bhanwar Lal, Aged About 43 Years, R/o House No. 292, Meghwalo Ka Mohalla, Devpura, Bundi (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Dr. Jogaram, Principal Secretary, Local Self Government, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
3. Dr. Ravindra Goswami, District Collector, Bundi.
4. Shri Mahaveer Singh Sisodiya, Executive Officer, Municipal Council, Bundi. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Dipti Jindal for Mr. Amit Jindal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nitin Sinsinwar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 05/02/2026
1. Instant contempt petition was filed alleging disobedience of the order dated 01.12.2021 passed in D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.10016/2020 stating inter alia that despite directions of the High Court, shelter home for cattle has not been constructed by the Municipal Council, Bundi.
2. In response to the contempt petition, compliance report dated 15.10.2025 has been filed by respondent No.4, disclosing
[2026:RJ-JP:5475-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-708/2022] that the construction of shelter home has been completed and the delay had occurred due to circumstantial reasons as earlier, no contractor was ready to carry out the construction. In addition to the compliance report, counsel for respondents states that after completion of shelter home for cattle, same has been inaugurated on 17.10.2025 and in operation.
3. The compliance report dated 15.10.2025 and the statements of counsel for the respondents, have not been refuted by counsel for the petitioner.
4. In that view of the matter, we find that respondent No.4 is not guilty for disobedience of the order dated 01.12.2021.
5. As a result, proceedings of present contempt petition are hereby closed and contempt petition stands disposed of.
6. Notices of contempt stand discharged.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J (SUDESH BANSAL),J LALIT MOHAN /12