Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18272 (AP)

The Meharnagar Welfare Society v. Sri V.Ravi Kumar

CC/1264/2013 · 2026-03-30

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010106892013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1264/2013 Between: 1. THE MEHARNAGAR WELFARE SOCIETY, (REGD.NO.728/2010), D.NO.65-8-7, MEHARNAGAR, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DIST. REP BY ITS PRESIDENT, ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI V RAVI KUMAR, THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER SRI V. RAVI KUMAR 2. SMT NEETHU KUMARI PRASAD I A S, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, AT KAKINADA. 3. DR K MADHUSUDAN PRASAD, THE MUNICIPAL HEALTH OFFICER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF KAKINADA, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DIST. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents for non-compliance of the orders passed by this Honourable High Court in W.P.M.P. No.7050 of 2013 in W.P.No.5662 of 2013 dated 26-02-2013and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 1. CH SAMSON BABU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1264 OF 2013 The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed complaining of violation of the Interim Order passed by the erstwhile High Court dated 16.02.2013 in W.P.M.P.Nos.7050 & 7051 of 2013 in W.P.No.5662 of 2013. 2. It transpires from the record that during the pendency of the Contempt Case, the main Writ Petition No.5662 of 2013 itself has been disposed of, vide Order dated 17.12.2018, which is on record. The Final Order passed by the erstwhile High Court dated 17.12.2018 is taken on record. 3. Having taken note of the same, this Court is of the view that this Contempt Case has become infructuous. 4. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Date: 31.03.2026 MNR 4 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1264 OF 2013 Dt: 31.03.2026 Mnr