BAIL APPLN. 2395/2026 1 $~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010270602026 + BAIL APPLN. 2395/2026 & CRL.M.A. 18668/2026 SATNAM SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Verma, Advocate (Through VC) versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN O R D E R % 15.09.2026 1. Applicant seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 0125/2025, registered at Cyber Police Station South-West for commission of offence 112(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 2. The aforesaid FIR has been registered after conducting requisite technical analysis and financial trail examination of data related to mule accounts, withdrawals etc. 3. During inquiry, analysis of one mule account opened at SBI, Kapasahera in the name of a company “Dynamic Dreamz” was identified as an account, which was involved in number of National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (NCRP) complaints. During investigation, police learnt the names of the accounts holders of the aforesaid bank account. There were Ranjeet Singh and Gurmeet Singh. Ranjeet Singh was arrested and is, reportedly, on bail already whereas Gurmeet Singh is yet to be arrested. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/09/2026 at 10:56:02 BAIL APPLN. 2395/2026 2 4. Charge-sheet qua accused Ranjeet Singh has already been filed. 5. Learned counsel for applicant submits that there is no connecting material on record which may indicate that applicant is part of any conspiracy or his involvement in the alleged cyber fraud in question, whereas according to learned Addl. P.P. for State, he is member of a group which is indulged into petty organized crime. 6. Ms. Dalal submits that as per the investigation done so far, aforesaid account of Dynamic Dreamz is involved in 282 NCRP complaints from across the country and in a period of just 139 days from 30.04.2025 to 15.09.2025, there was credit of Rs. 2,87,88,405/- and, virtually, the entire such amount was withdrawn as the total debits are of Rs. 2,84,69,938/-. She submits that aforesaid account was opened with the help of amount arranged by applicant herein. According to her, Rs. 1 lac was funded by applicant and such account was credited in the account of Gurdeep Singh and Gurdeep Singh further used the aforesaid amount in opening the aforesaid account of Dynamic Dreamz. 7. She submits that when the physical verification of office premises of Dynamic Dreamz, situated at Kapasahera, was conducted, it came to fore that aforesaid premises was taken on rent in March 2025 for the purposes of opening of said bank account in the name of said company and the statement of concerned owner of the premises clearly indicates that it was Satnam Singh (applicant herein) who used to pay the rent in cash. Reference has also been made by learned Addl. P.P. for State to the statement made by such owner as well as to the statement of one Ms. Anamika, who was employed as Receptionist in the aforesaid company and used to sit at the aforesaid tenanted premises. According to her statement also, aforesaid company was being run This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/09/2026 at 10:56:02 BAIL APPLN. 2395/2026 3 by Satnam Singh only, who even told her that payment gateway has yet not started and, therefore, they were not able to run their business. 8. Apparently, case pertains to organized cyber crime syndicate and generally, the conspiracy in such type of matters is so deep rooted that it is, virtually, impossible to unearth the same, unless there is custodial interrogation. 9. The complete modus operandi of the syndicate would become clearer when police is able to interrogate the applicant comprehensively and is also, thereby, able to reach the money trail. 10. Keeping in mind the facts presented before this Court and also appreciating the fact that such incidents of cyber crimes are on steep rise, this Court, at this stage, does not find any compelling reason to admit applicant to anticipatory bail. 11. Application is accordingly dismissed. 12. Other pending application also stands disposed of accordingly. MANOJ JAIN, J SEPTEMBER 15, 2026/dr/sy This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/09/2026 at 10:56:02