Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1827 (UTT)

SULEMAN v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/550/2026 · 2026-04-01

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL No. 550 of 2026 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Bilal Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. The instant writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:- (i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned FIR dated 19.01.2026 registered as Case Crime No. 0014 of 2026 under Section 3,5 read with Section 11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act 2007 P.S. Bahadrabad District Haridwar (Annexure No. 1). (ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents not to arrest the petitioner in Case Crime No. 0014 of 2026 under Section 3,5 read with Section 11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act 2007 P.S. Bahadrabad District Haridwar till the pendency of present petition. 4. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is ready to surrender before the court concerned, however, some protection may be given to him till he surrenders. 5. The State counsel has no objection. 6. In such view of the matter, instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to surrender before the court concerned on or before 12.05.2026. Till then, the petitioner shall not be arrested provided he cooperates with the investigation. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 01.04.2026 Parul