Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1827 (JHR)

AJAY KUMAR RAY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./11848/2025 · 2026-03-11

Sri Ananda Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:6468 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 11848 of 2025 Ajay Kumar Ray, aged about 34 years, son of Ganga Sagar Ray, H.No.- 08, ward no.-14, P.O-Road No.1, Ramdhin Bagan Indranagar and P.S Telco, Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum, Jharkhand..... Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party(s). ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : None For the State : Mr. Subhodh Kumar Dubey, A.P.P. ----- 03/11.03.2026: This bail application has been filed under Sections 483 & 484 of BNSS, 2023 wherein, prayer has been made for grant of bail as he is in custody for allegedly committing offence punishable under Sections 406, 408, 409, 467, 468, 471 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. Heard learned counsel for the State and have also gone through the impugned order. 3. Learned counsel for the state opposes the prayer for bail. 4. There is allegation against this petitioner that he withdrew Rs.1,22,82,500/- from the office vault to deposit it in ICICI Bank, but only sent a photo of a deposit slip showing Rs.66,32,400/-, which was deposited. Later, the head office confirmed that the amount was never deposited and the receipt was forged. 5. After going through the record, especially the impugned order, I find that the allegation against the petitioner is serious in nature involving criminal breach of trust, forgery and misappropriation of huge amount, which was entrusted to him in course of his employment. The record indicates that the petitioner along with co-accused had withdrawn huge amount of cash from the office vault for depositing the same in the Bank, however, the amount was allegedly not deposited and a forged deposit slip was produced. 6. Considering the allegation, which is serious in nature, I am not inclined to grant privilege of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner, named above, in connection with Bistupur P.S. Case No. 149 of 2024, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur, stands rejected. (ANANDA SEN, J.) March 11, 2026 Anu/- Cp.3 Uploaded on: 12.3.2026