HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6286 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard. 2. In view of the order, which is being proposed to be passed today, notices are not being issued to the respondents. 3. The solitary relief claimed in the present writ petition for a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) Court No.9 Mathura to decide 7C application filed by plaintiff-respondents in Original Suit No.388 of 2009, (Thakur Hanuman Ji Maharaj Mandir & another versus Rajveer Singh & others). 4. Learned counsel prayed that the said application may be decided, expeditiously. 5. Since the above-mentioned case is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 6. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) Court No.9 Mathura to decide 7C application filed by plaintiff-respondents in Original Suit No.388 of 2009, (Thakur Hanuman Ji Maharaj Mandir & another versus Rajveer Singh & others), in accordance with law, within a period of eight months provided there is no other legal impediment. May 6, 2026 Rajesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhila Nand Pandey, Nilam Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Sukhveer Singh Alias Sukhveerdas .....Petitioner(s) Thakur Hanuman Ji Maharaj Virajman And 16 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad