Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18265 (AP)

M Sankar Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/1660/2026 · 2026-03-08

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010108252026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1660/2026 Between: M SANKAR REDDY, S/O LATE M. VENKAT REDDY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O B. JARRAVARIPALLE, H/O KELLAPATIA,GANGAVARAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATHI. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. MEDAPATI SANTOSH REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant petition under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed seeking to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner, in connection with Crime No.205 of 2025 on the file of Gangavaram Urban Police Station, Chittoor District which is registered for the offence under Section 109(1), 118(1) and 115(2) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 2. Sri Medapati Santosh Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioner / Accused No.4 would submit that the Petitioner did not commit any offence 2 as alleged and the Petitioner is falsely implicated in the present crime. It is submitted that the Petitioner is ready to furnish the sureties to the satisfaction of the Court. 3. Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the petition and would submit that there are specific allegations against the Petitioner and that no case is made out to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner. 4. Considering the submissions made and on a perusal of the material on record, the nature of the offence alleged against the Petitioner, this Court is of the view there are no grounds to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner. 5. In the result, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. The Petitioner shall surrender before the concerned Court and move a regular bail application. On filing such application, the learned Judge may pass appropriate orders according to law as expeditiously as possible. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:09.03.2026 Dinesh 3 THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION No.1660 of 2026 DATE:09.03.2026 Dinesh