[2026:RJ-JP:670] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4459/2025 1. Sandeep Son Of Shri Chhotelal, Resident Of Village Lalpur, Mahwa , District Jaipur Raj. 2. Hemendra Son Of Shri Hari Singh, Resident Of Village Ni- wali, Tehsil Bhusawar, District Bharatpur (Raj). 3. Atul Son Of Shri Shiv Dayal, Resident Of Village Niwali, Tehsil Bhusawar, District Bharatpur (Raj). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Abhishek Meena Son Of Shri Suman, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of Village Atrampura, Police Station Bhu- sawar, District Bharatpur ( Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Karanpal Singh For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Amit Punia, PP Mr. Arun Kumar Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 08/01/2026 1. Petitioners, complainant and injured namely Lalit are present in person and have duly been identified by their respective counsel. 2. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of the BNSS, the accused-petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.165/2025 registered at Police Station Bhusawar, District Bharatpur for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 140(3), 351(2) & 351(3) of BNS, 2023 along with criminal proceedings arising out of it. [2026:RJ-JP:670] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4459/2025] 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have entered into a compromise with the complainant as well as the injured. He submits that the complainant does not want to pursue the impugned FIR. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant do not dispute the aforesaid factual position. 5. Considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for my perusal and the fact that the parties have resolved their dispute amicably and the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604], the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the above, this criminal misc. petition is allowed and the FIR No.165/2025 registered at Police Station Bhusawar, District Bharatpur along with criminal proceedings arising out of it are quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 7. Stay application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /308