Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18263 (AP)

M/s HAZARATHAIAH CONSTRUCTION v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/6231/2026 · 2026-03-31

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010110422026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 6231/2026 Between: 1. M/S HAZARATHAIAH CONSTRUCTION, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER NADENLA HARISH, S/O N. HAZARATHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O D.NO 15/4/48, RTC COLONY MAIN ROAD, MANIPURAM, 2ND LANE, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522001. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522501 2. THE GUNTUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER GUNTUR DISTRICT.522501 3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522501 4. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, A.P. SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522501 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 1. M.V. VIJAYADITYA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri Vijayaditya Reddy, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Ms. Naga Chandrika, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance & Planning and Sri S. Vijay Kumar, learned Counsel representing Sri A.S.C. Bose, learned Standing Counsel for Municipal Corporation. 2. Sri S. Vijay Kumar, learned Counsel representing Sri A.S.C. Bose, learned Standing Counsel for Municipal Corporation, has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Guntur, dated 28.02.2026. Copy of it is supplied to the Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and the same is taken on record. 3. The Written Instructions would indicate that the Writ Petitioner had completed the execution of the work by commencing the work from 02.04.2025 and completed the same by 30.06.2025 and the same was audited on 23.07.2025. It is also indicated that the bill will be uploaded in due course onto the NIDHI Portal for payment. 4. Having so recorded, this Court deems it appropriate to allow this Writ Petition with a direction to all the Respondents including Respondent Nos.2 & 4 to complete the entire administrative process, both inter-departmental and intra-departmental, by way of mutual co-operation and coordination, within a period of sixteen (16) weeks from today, and to transfer the net amount as admitted by the Respondents for a sum of Rs.44,19,012/- to the bank account of the Writ Petitioner within four (04) weeks thereafter. 3 5. 3 5. The Writ Petitioner is directed to submit the bank account details to the Competent Authority within four (04) weeks from today for effective compliance. 6. With these observations and directions, the Writ Petition is allowed. No order as to costs. 7. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. _________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 01.04.2026 DSV 4 139 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 6231/2026 01.04.2026 DSV 5 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No. WRIT PETITION NO: 6231/2026 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No DATE ORDER Office Note 01.04.2026 GRKP, J Writ Petition is allowed. (vide separate order) ___________ GRKP, J DSV 6