Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18260 (DEL)

RAKESH SAMALIA v. RAJINDER KR JAIN(SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS. LRS

RC.REV./115/2026 · 2026-09-15

Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010142562026 + RC.REV. 115/2026 & CM APPL. 22652/2026 (stay) RAKESH SAMALIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Adv. versus RAJINDER KR JAIN(SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS. LRS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Ms. Kavita Sharma & Mr. Suvan Sharma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR O R D E R % 15.09.2026 1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, seeking to impugn the Judgment dated 23.09.2025 passed by the learned ARC-02, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Eviction Petition, RC ARC 79929/2016 titled as “Shri Rajender Kumar Jain v. Shri Rakesh Samalia”, whereby the eviction petition was allowed and an order of eviction was passed. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner would be forthright in submitting that pursuant to the execution proceedings, the possession of the subject premises has already been handed over, and he does not seek to press the present Petition. 3. He accordingly submits that the present Petition may be dismissed as being not pressed. 4. He, however, seeks some consideration with respect to the costs This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/09/2026 at 11:27:54 imposed by the learned ARC. He submits that the said costs may either be waived or reduced. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the Respondent, on instructions, submits that he has no objection if the said costs are reduced. 6. In view thereof, this Court directs that a sum of Rs. 60,000/- shall be paid by the Petitioner to the Respondent towards costs. 7. Learned counsel for the Petitioner undertakes to ensure that the aforesaid costs are paid within a period of four (04) weeks from today. 8. Accordingly, the present Petition, along with all pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. SEPTEMBER 15, 2026/v/jk This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/09/2026 at 11:27:54