Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18258 (JHR)

BAJRANGI KUMAR GUPTA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY

WPC/4346/2026 · 2026-07-01

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:19167 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 4346 of 2026 -- Bajrangi Kumar Gupta, aged about 32 years, son of Dhanpat Saw, resident of Village Simariya, Ward No. 06, P.O. Simariya, P.S. Dumardiha, District Koderma, Jharkhand. ...Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 2. The Examination Controller, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, having its office at Kali Nagar, Chai Bagan, Namkom, P.O. and P.S. Namkom, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN -- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Resp.-State : A.C to Advocate General For the Resp.-JSSC : M/s. Sanjoy Piprawall, Prince Kumar, Jay Prakash, Advocates -- 02/01.07.2026 The instant writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner for the following reliefs: (A) For issuance of an appropriate writ(s) / order(s) /direction(s) commanding upon the respondents especially the respondent no.2 to allow the petitioner to access answer key of JTMACCE-2025 for the subjects "Al and Coding" and "Cyber Security" Examinations, which were held on 19.01.2026 & 21.01.2026, respectively. (B) For issuance of an appropriate writ(s) / order(s) /direction(s) commanding upon the respondents especially the respondent no.2 to award marks to the petitioner for the question nos. 15, 51, 74, 78, 80, 82, 85, 95, 101 and 119 subject-Computer Science in the JTMACCE-2025 re- examination held on 09.05.2026 as the petitioner after verifying from the answer key uploaded by the respondent no.2, he found marks for the above mentioned questions have not been awarded to him and he has correctly answered to those questions. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant application may be disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the Examination Controller of JSSC (Respondent no. 2), to consider his grievance. 2026:JHHC:19167 2 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that since no counter affidavit has been filed; accordingly, the petitioner if so chooses he may approach the Examination Controller of JSSC- Respondent no2. 4. Having regard to the above, the instant writ application stands disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the Examination Controller of JSSC-Respondent no. 2 by filing fresh representation within a period of 10 days from today. Needless to say, if the petitioner approaches the Examination Controller of JSSC-Respondent no. 2, he shall verify the records of the case and consider his representation within a period of 3 weeks from the date of receipt of such representatioin. It goes without saying that if the claim of the petitioner is found genuine, necessary order be passed. 5. With the aforesaid observations/direction, the instant writ application stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 1st July, 2026 Jk Uploaded on 01/07/2026