Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18252 (CHH)

MRS. MADHURI BALA v. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/4791/2022 · 2026-03-23

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:14004 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4791 of 2022 * - Mrs. Madhuri Bala W/o Shri Amit Bala, Aged About 34 Years Presently Posted As Seed Manager, Processing Center Balod, District : Balod, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Agriculture, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Chhattisgarh Beej Evam Krishi Vikas Nigam Limited, Beej Bhawan Ravigram Telibandha, G.E. Road, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Through Managing Director, Chhattisgarh Rajya Beej Bhawan Ravigram, Telibandha, G.E. Road, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Chhattisgarh Rajya Beej Evam Krishi Vikas Nigam Limited, Beej Processing Center, Through Managing Director (Seeds), Balod, District : Balod, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Chhattisgarh Rajya Beej Evam Krishi Vikas Nigam Limited, Beej Processing Center, Through Managing Director (Seeds), Kanker, District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh 5 - Shri Bharat Yadav, Assistant Grade II, Processing Center, Ruabandha, District Durg (Now Transfer By The Amended Transfer Order At Seed Manager, Jhalmala, District Balod) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Kalpesh Ruparel, Advocate For Respondent No. 1 For Respondents No. 2, 3 & 4 : : Mr. Anway Tiwari, Panel Lawyer Mr. Shayon Kar, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Prakash Tiwari, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 24/03/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2026.03.25 20:07:44 +0530 2 “10.1 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned amended transfer order dated 29.06.2022 passed by respondent no. 2. 10.2 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authority to permit the petitioner to work at the same place, as she is working i.e. Seed Manager Processing Center, Jhalmala, Balad, District Balod (C.G.). 10.3 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the amended transfer order dated 29.06.2022 of the respondent no. 5 at the place of petitioner. 10.4 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief(s)/writ(s), order(s) in favour of the petitioners, which the Hon’ble Court deemed fit & just in the facts & circumstances of the case, including awarding of the costs of the petitioners.” 2. Mr. Shayon Kar, learned counsel appearing for respondents No. 2, 3 & 4 would submit that the services of the petitioner has already been transferred from present place of posting. 3. At this stage, Mr. Kalpesh Ruparel, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to revive his prayer, if cause of action still survives. 4. Permission granted. 5. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti