[2026:RJ-JP:4557] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Review Petition (Writ) No. 154/2022 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10603/2015 Dwarka Prasad Meena Son Of Shri Raghunath Prasad Meena, Aged About 53 Years, Resident Of Village Togdaswaroop Singh, Post Togda Khurd, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Education, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer. 3. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner. 4. Dalip Kumar S/o Shri Rameshwar Lal, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Village And Post Bhimsar, District Jhunjhunu. 5. Nemichand S/o Shri Nathuram, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Parwalo Ki Dhani, Post Mahanbari, Via Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). 6. Mukesh Kumar Garwa S/o Shri Mukandaram, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Village And Post Siryasar Kala, Via Nuwa, District Jhunjhunu. 7. Rajkumar Digarwal S/o Shri Shishram, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Village Chanana, Tehsil Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu. 8. Satish Chand Singhoya S/o Shri Shubhkaran Singh Singhoya, Aged About 55 Years, R/o House No. 4/205, Housing Board, Jhunjhunu. 9. Prakash Harijan S/o Shri Bhagirath Mal, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Village Dundlodh, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). 10. Om Prakash S/o Shri Hariram Bhagat, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Banarsi Devi Road, Ward No.23, Pipli Chowk, Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). ----Respondents [2026:RJ-JP:4557] (2 of 3) [WRW-154/2022] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bajrang Lal Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mirza Faisal Baig Mr. Bhavya Kala on behalf of Mr. Devansh Sharma, Dy.G.C. HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA Order 31/01/2026 1. Heard on application (No.156/2022) for condonation of delay in filing the review petition. 2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Delay in filing the review petition is condoned. 3. This is a review petition seeking review of the order dated 05.03.2021 passed by this Court, whereby this Court covered the cases by the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Prakash Chand Meena and Others Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others, reported in (2015) 8 SCC 484. 4. It appears that the review-petitioner filed SLP before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, however, later on, withdrew the same with liberty to file a review petition before this Court, leave for which was granted by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. 5. Having condoned the delay, I have carefully re-examine the issue raised by the review-petitioner in this review petition. This Court finds that, from the facts which have come on record, it is apparent that the review-petitioner too, does not fall within the ambit of eligibility. Although, the review-petitioner belongs to SC/ST category, but the review-petitioner possessed qualification of B.P.Ed., while the notification for the post of PTI Grade-III has [2026:RJ-JP:4557] (3 of 3) [WRW-154/2022] been held to be only C.P.Ed. by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Prakash Chand Meena (supra). 6. Considering the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Prakash Chand Meena (supra), the contention of learned counsel for the review-petitioner that he may be allowed to be appointed against the post which remain vacant, cannot be accepted, as the minimum eligibility is the first aspect, which is required to be considered for appointment. 7. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed. (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACTING CJ N.GANDHI/RAJAT/4