Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18248 (KAR)

GIRIGOWDA S v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/15517/2025 · 2026-06-01

R Nataraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25389 WP No. 15517 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 15517 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN: GIRIGOWDA S SON OF LATE SALGIRIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, RESIDING AT CHELUR VILLAGE, MARALWADI HOBLI, HAROHALLI TALUK, CHELUR-562112. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SURESH K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE (INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT) M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001. 2. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO.14/3, RASHTROTHANA PARISHATH 2ND FLOOR, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU-560001. REPRESENTED BY SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP) 1ST FLOOR, MARASHI ARAVIND BHAVAN, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU-560001. …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25389 WP No. 15517 of 2025 (BY SRI. ADITYA DIWAKAR, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.1) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED UNDER SECTION 28(1) AND 28(4) OF THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT ACT, 1966, PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 25.10.2006 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 28(1) VIDE NOTIFICATION BEARING NO.CI431SPQ.2006 AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 02.02.2010 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 28(4) VIDE NOTIFICATION CI 307 SPQ 2009 TO AN EXTENT OF 14½ GUNTAS IN SY.NO.110/3 OF CHEELUR VILLAGE, MARALVADI HOBLI, HAROHALLI TALUK, PREVIOUSLY KANKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT, AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND B AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. 2. The memo is taken on record. In view of the memo, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE HJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8