2.as.wp.10525.2012.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10525 OF2012 M/s. Prachi Industries … Petitioner Versus Smt. Surekha Shantaram Patil @ Smt. Puja Prakash Patil and ors. … Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 12975 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 10525 OF2012 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2144 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 10525 OF2012 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 12903 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 10525 OF2012 Smt. Surekha Shantaram Patil @ Smt. Puja Prakash Patil and ors. … Applicants In the matter between M/s. Prachi Industries … Petitioner Versus Smt. Surekha Shantaram Patil @ Smt. Puja Prakash Patil and ors. … Respondents *** Mr. R. V. Govilkar, Senior Advocate, a/w Ms. Sanika Kurlekar i/b. Mr. Mihir Govilkar for Petitioner. None for Respondent Nos.1 to 10B. Mr. Yuvraj D. Patil, AGP for Respondent-State. *** Vina Khadpe 1 VINA ARVIND KHADPE Digitally signed by VINA ARVIND KHADPE Date: 2026.10.13 15:24:50 +0530 2.as.wp.10525.2012.doc CORAM : M.M. SATHAYE, J. DATE : 13 OCTOBER, 2026 P.C. : 1. Learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioner pointed out that, pursuant to the order dated 29.01.2026 passed in IA No.12957 of 2025 (moved by Respondent No. 1 to 9) in the above Petition, the Additional Collector has proceeded to pass orders dated 12.05.2026 in Tenancy/63(1)(A)/Case Nos.84 of 2025 and 85 of 2024. He further submits that, therefore, the challenge in the Writ Petition has become infructuous. However he prays that the Petitioner may be at liberty to challenge the said orders dated 12.05.2026 independently. 2. Nobody appeared for Respondent Nos. 1 to 10B. Copies of orders are taken on record. 3. In view of the submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous, with liberty granted as prayed. All contentions in that regard are kept open. In view of disposal of the petition, all pending Civil / Interim Application/s are also disposed of . (M.M. SATHAYE, J.) Vina Khadpe 2