Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18246 (JHR)

SAILDEO ORAON @ SHILDEO ORAON v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3392/2026 · 2026-06-29

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:18870 ) -1- A.B.A. No. 3392 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3392 of 2026 1. Saildeo Oraon @ Shildeo Oraon, son of Mohan Oraon, resident of Village- Barwatanr, P.O. & P.S. Pandepur, District- Latehar, Jharkhand 2. Fulgens Tigga @ Fuliens Tigga, aged about 31 years, son of Bernet Tigga, resident of Village- Pandepura, P.O. & P.S. Pandepur, District- Latehar, Jharkhand 3. Amit Kumar Bhagat @ Amit Oraon, aged about 34 years, son of Rajendra Oraon, resident of Village- Salodih, P.O. & P.S. Pandepur, District- Latehar, Jharkhand 4. Rajesh Oraon, aged about 31 years, resident of Village- Salodih, P.O. & P.S. Pandepur, District- Latehar, Jharkhand 5. Surendar Oraon, aged about 48 years, resident of Village- Pandeypura, P.O. & P.S. Pandepur, District- Latehar, Jharkhand 6. Budhdeo Oraon @ Budheshwar Oraon, aged about 28 years, son of Mohan Oraon, resident of Village- Pandepur, P.O. & P.S. Pandepur, District- Latehar, Jharkhand 7. Surajlal Oraon @ Mallu Oraon, aged about 26 years, son of Suku Oraon @ Saku Oraon, resident of Village- Buchidadi, P.O. & P.S. Pandepur, District- Latehar, Jharkhand 8. Kapildeo Oraon @ Kapildev Oraon, aged about 31 years, son of Rajendra Oraon, resident of Village-Pandepura, P.O. & P.S. Pandepur, District- Latehar, Jharkhand … Petitioners -Versus- The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Abhay Kumar Chaturvedy, Advocate For the State : Mr. Tarun Kumar, A.P.P. ----- 04/29.06.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Latehar P.S. Case No.03/2026 dated 03.01.2026, registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109(1), 303(2), 308(3), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the Court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that there are case and counter case between the parties. He further submits that the ( 2026:JHHC:18870 ) -2- A.B.A. No. 3392 of 2026 altercation took place on 1st January, 2026 when both the sides were celebrating new year. He then submits that the allegations of assault are there against one Ashish Oraon and the said Ashish Oraon is not the petitioner herein. He next submits that the petitioners are having no criminal antecedents, as disclosed in paragraph 14 of this application. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations of assault are there. 5. Looking into the contents of the FIR, it transpires that there are general and omnibus allegations so far as these petitioners are concerned. Further, direction allegation of assault is there against Ashish Oraon and pursuant to that, injury has been received by the son of the informant. The petitioners are having no criminal antecedents, as disclosed in paragraph 14 of this application. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender, they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar in connection with Latehar P.S. Case No.03/2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 29th June, 2026 Ajay/