Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18243 (AP)

CHOKKAKULA SUJATHA v. UNION OF INDIA

CMA/128/2020 · 2026-02-25

V Sujatha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010108222020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 128/2020 Between: 1. CHOKKAKULA SUJATHA, W/O. LATE LAKSHMANARAO, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O. SRUNGAVARAPUKOTA VILLAGE, S. KOTA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. CHOKKAKULA GEETHIKA SANTOSH, D/O. LATE LAKSHMANARAO, AGEDA BOUT 26 YEARS, R/O. SRUNGAVARAPUKOTA VILLAGE, S. KOTA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. CHOKKAKULA SANTOSH KUMAR, S/O. LATE LAKSHMANARAO, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, R/ O. SRUNGAVARAPUKOTA VILLAGE, S. KOTA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. CHOKKAKULA SATYANARAYANA, S/O. LATE LATCHANNA, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, R/O. SRUNGAVARAPUKOTA VILLAGE, S. KOTA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. UNION OF INDIA, rep. by its General Manager, South Central Railway, Secunderabad. ...RESPONDENT 2 Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. P L RAO Counsel for the Respondent: 1. BETHAPALLI SURYANARAYANA (CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 128/2020 J U D G M E N T: 1. This is an appeal preferred by the applicants being wife and children of deceased - Chokkakula Lakshman Rao, aged 45 years, who died in an untoward incident on 18.10.2013 challenging the order dated 09.01.2020 in OAII(U) No.261 of 2014 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Amaravati Bench at Guntur, wherein the claimants have claimed Rs.10,00,000/- as compensation for the death of Chokkakula Lakshman Rao and the same was dismissed by the Tribunal. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing M/s. P.L.Rao, learned Counsel representing Appellants requested this Court to withdraw the appeal. 3. Recorded the submission of learned Counsel for Appellants. 4. Accordingly, Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA KS Dated 26.02.2026. 4 182 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 128/2020 DATED 26.02.2026 KS