[2026:RJ-JP:67] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10840/2025 Vijaypal S/o Hari Singh Yadav, R/o Majari (Jokhavas), Tehsil Kotkasim, District Alwar At Present District Khairthal-Tijara, Raj. ----Petitioner/Plaintiff/Applicant Versus Roop Chand S/o Hari Singh, R/o Majari (Jokhavas), Tehsil Kotkasim, District Alwar At Present District Khairthal-Tijara, Raj. ----Respondent/Defendant/Non-applicant Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10808/2025 Vijaypal S/o Hari Singh Yadav, R/o Majari (Jokhavas), Tehsil Kotkasim, District Alwar At Present District Khairthal-Tijara, Raj. ----Petitioner/Plaintiff/Applicant Versus 1. Vijay Kumar S/o Om Prakash, R/o Majari (Jokhavas), Tehsil Kotkasim, At Present Residing At House No. 85, Avenue 69, Near Tulip Chok, Badshapur, Gurugram, Hariyana. 2. Samsher S/o Omprakash, R/o Majari (Jokhavas), Tehsil Kotkasim, At Present Residing At C-71, Swaroop Nagar, Delhi. ----Respondents/Defendants/Non-applicants S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10841/2025 Vijaypal S/o Hari Singh Yadav, R/o Majari (Jokhavas), Tehsil Kotkasim, District Alwar At Present District Khairthal-Tijara, Raj. ----Petitioner/Plaintiff/Applicant Versus 1. Dinesh S/o Late Mahveer, R/o Majari (Jokhavas), Tehsil Kotkasim, At Present Shanti Bus Service, Shop No. 5, Main Mata Road, CRPF Camp Chock, Gurugram, Hariyana. 2. Yogesh S/o Mahveer, R/o Majari (Jokhavas), Tehsil Kotkasim, At Present Plot No. 76, Kushal Nagar, Neer Tulip Chock, Badshapur, Gurugram, Hariyana. ----Respondents/Defendants/Non-applicants For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gajender Singh Rathore [2026:RJ-JP:67] (2 of 2) [CW-10840/2025] For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sanjay Yadav HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment/ Order 06/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that because of the impugned order, his rights in the suit may be affected, and therefore only prays that the learned trial Court may not be influenced while deciding the suit. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents, who has put in appearance as caveator, has no serious objection to the said prayer. 3. Accordingly, these writ petitions are disposed of with a direction that the learned trial Court shall decide the suit on its own merits, without being influenced in any manner by the order passed on the application for temporary injunction. 4. All pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (BIPIN GUPTA),J Sudha/12-14