2026:HHC:31923 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Review Petition No.105 of 2021 Date of decision: 31.07.2026 Sukh Ram & Anr. ...Petitioners. Versus The District Collector, Sirmour & Ors. …Respondents. Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent(s) : Mr. Raj Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No.1-State. : Mr. Aditya Singh Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Virbahadur Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.2. : Ms. Aanchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.3 & 4. Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner at length and in response thereto learned Deputy Advocate General and learned counsel representing the private respondents, I am of the considered opinion that there is no error apparent on the record or perversity in the impugned judgment warranting exercise of review 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes -2- jurisdiction under Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure read with Order XLVII Rules 1 and 3 thereof. 2. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed along with pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge 31st July, 2026 (Pardeep)