[2026:RJ-JP:7538] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11851/2020 1. Gopesh Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Banshi Dhar Sharma, Aged About 51 Years, Resident Of Eshar Das Ka Mohalla, Amarsar, Amarsar, Shahpura, Jaipur, Rajasthan 2. Mahesh Kumar Saini S/o Shri Bodu Ram Mali, Resident Of Rengus Road, Near Puliya, Bhomiya Colony, Ward No. 35, Chomu, Jaipur, Rajasthan 3. Narendra Singh Rathore S/o Shri Indra Singh, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Mangal Vihar Colony, Murlipura, Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Cooperative Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Nehru Sahkar Bhawan, Bhawani Singh Road, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Rajasthan Rajya Sahkari Upbhokhta Sangh Limited (Confed), Through Managing Director, Room No. 237, 2Nd Floor, Nehru Sahkar Bhawan, Bhawani Singh Road, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Iliyas Khan for Mr. Tanveer Ahamad For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nikhil Simlote Mr. Saleem Khan Mr. Hansraj Kuldeep, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 17/02/2026 1. The instant writ petition is filed by the petitioners with following prayer:- "1. The impugned E-tender notice order dated 30.07.2020 and consequential decision to engage [2026:RJ-JP:7538] (2 of 2) [CW-11851/2020] placement agency may kindly be quashed and set aside. 2. That further the order dated 23.09.2020 (Annexure-11) by which the services have been sought to be handed over the placement agency may also be quashed and set aside in the interest of justice. 3. Any other appropriate order, which may be found just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, be passed in favour of the petitioners. 4. Cost of the writ petition may also be awarded in favour of the petitioners." 2. Initially, the writ petition was filed on behalf of 18 petitioners but subsequently 15 petitioners have withdrawn and same is recorded vide order dated 08.12.2022. Now this writ petition is surviving only with regard to (i) Gopesh Kumar Sharma, (ii) Mahesh Kumar Saini and (iii) Narendra Singh Rathore. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No. 3 submits that neither they are changing mode of employment nor terminating the services of petitioners. 4. Having taken note of the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed with direction to the respondent No.3 not to terminate services of the petitioners except in accordance with Rules as prevailing upon the petitioners. 5. With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed with pending application, if any. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/3