HAMEED S/O SHRI RATI MOHAMMAD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/9364/2025 · 2026-01-13
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18232 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18232 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:1387] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9364/2025 Hameed S/o Shri Rati Mohammad, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Village Alavada, Police Station Nauganva, District Alwar (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arafat Hussain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 13/01/2026
1. Petitioner has filed this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.0207/2025 registered with the Police Station, Nouganwa, District Alwar for offence under Sections 316(2) & 318(4) of B.N.S., 2023.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in no manner connected with the alleged sale of land, which is said to be Mandir Mafi land. He also submits that the Court vide order dated 07.08.2025, directed the petitioner to appear before the Investigating Officer. He further submits that the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Officer and has been interrogated and now the petitioner is no more required for any kind of interrogation or recovery. He also submits that the petitioner is ready to cooperate with the investigation and because
[2026:RJ-JP:1387] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9364/2025] of any act of the father of the petitioner, which could be a criminal act, the petitioner cannot be penalized. Therefore, the petitioner may be extended the benefit of anticipatory bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the anticipatory bail application. He verifies the fact that the petitioner under the direction of the Court has appeared before the Investigating Officer. 4. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and the material made available on record with the bail application. 5. Taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioner that he is a part of conspiracy of sale of Mandir Mafi land by his father of the complainant and the fact that he has already been interrogated by the Investigating Officer in view of the direction of the Court, this Court deems just and proper to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. The Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed. The S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station Nouganwa, District Alwar in F.I.R. No.0207/2025 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (I). that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as
[2026:RJ-JP:1387] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9364/2025] and when required; (ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer, and (iii).
that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /216