APHC010105242026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 957/2026 Between: 1. NARVANENI MURALI, S/O HANUMANTHA RAO AGED ABOUT 54YRS, OCC BUSINESS R/O H.N0.6-6/B, RYTHUPETA NANDIGAMA, NTR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. A B G TILAK, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE VIJAYAWADA POLICE COMMISSIONERATE NANDIGAMA, NTR DISTRICT 2. Y V V L NAIDU, STATION HOUSE OFFICER NANDIGAMA POLICE STATION NANDIGAMA, NTR DISTRICT . ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. The Court made the following: 2 ORDER:- Petitioner is alleging contempt of the order passed by this Court whereby this Court directed the 6th respondent to complete investigation by issuing a notice under Section 35 (3) of the BNSS to the petitioner and also taking into consideration the petitioner's representation with regard to the evidence that may assist the police in completing the investigation in a transparent manner. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for petitioner that notice under Section 35(3) of the BNSS was issued. However, the police have not considered the representation of the petitioner. It is always open for the petitioner to file a protest petition before the appropriate Court and seek further remedies as available under law. 3. On these considerations, this Court is of the considered view that the contempt deserves to be closed. 4. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date.13.03.2026 SR