Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:HHC:31916 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
Ex. Pet. No.1084 of 2026
Decided on: 31st July, 2026
Radhe Shyam
....Petitioner
versus
State of H.P. and others
...Respondents
Coram Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________________
For the petitioner: Mr. Mandeep Chandel, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Rupinder Singh Thakur, Additional Advocate General.
Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral)
Learned Additional Advocate General has produced a communication dated 01.07.2026 issued by the Director, Directorate of School Education, Himachal Pradesh and copy of office order dated 31.01.2026 passed by the Deputy Director of School Education (Elementary) Shimla, District Shimla-171004, H.P. The same are taken on record.
2.
A perusal of the aforesaid office order reveals that the petitioner has been allowed higher pay in the concerned level of pay matrix after completion of two years regular service, subject to the final outcome of LPA filed by the State in Mohit Sharma's case. The DDO concerned has been
1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
( 2026:HHC:31916 ) 2
directed to fix the pay of the petitioner and release the arrears.
3.
Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 02.01.2026 passed in CWP No. 20945 of 2025, titled, Radhe Shyam versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Others, has been complied with, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition and the same is closed. However, in case the arrears are not released in terms of the aforesaid judgment in favour of the petitioner within eight weeks from today, he shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the execution petition.
4.
The execution petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) 31st July, 2026
Judge (naveen)