$~115 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010433372026 + W.P.(C) 13362/2026 & CM APPL. 62199/2026, CM APPL. 62200/2026, CM APPL. 62201/2026 M/S CLARKS CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manish Kaushik, Mr. Yashpriya Sahran, Mr. Mishal Johari, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Katyal, SC with Mr Nitish Kumar Danda, Adv. for R-1&2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R % 14.09.2026 1. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers :- “a. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, to the Respondent Authority (DDA) to take action as per their policy, consider the Representation of the Petitioner and cancel/ revoke the impugned mutation dated 17.03.2020 bearing Intkal Nos. 3141–3143 in respect of property bearing No. 3B/4, Gangaram Hospital Road, Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi; b. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2026 at 11:50:45 Respondent Authorities to delete/ correct the entries made pursuant to the impugned mutation dated 17.03.2020 bearing Intkal Nos. 3141–3143 from their records; c. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondent Authorities to recognize and give effect, in their official records, to the cancellation/quashing of the impugned mutation and to ensure that no rights in favour of any person are recognized in the DDA records on the basis of the said cancelled mutation; d. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction restraining the Respondent Authorities from giving any further effect to the impugned mutation dated 17.03.2020 bearing Intkal Nos. 3141–3143 or acting upon the same for recognising or recording any further rights in respect of the subject property;…” 2. For the reasons stated in the petition, issue notice. 3. Mr. Katyal, learned standing counsel accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2. 4. There is nobody present on behalf of respondent No. 3 today. 5. Even though the petitioner has filed a similar civil suit, which is pending adjudication, Mr. Kaushik, learned counsel for the petitioner, in the present case, only requests that the present writ petition be treated as a representation and the respondent No. 1/ DDA shall decide the same in accordance with its extant policies. 6. The prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioner is reasonable. 7. In this view of the matter, let the present writ petition be treated as a This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2026 at 11:50:45 representation and the respondent shall decide the same in accordance with law and extant rules and regulations. 8. With these directions, the petition is disposed of. JASMEET SINGH, J SEPTEMBER 14, 2026/sp This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2026 at 11:50:45