Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25349 WP No. 16053 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 16053 OF 2026 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. RATNAMMA, W/O. LATE YOGESH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
2.
SRI. VENKATESH Y.S., S/O. LATE YOGESH, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS,
3.
SRI. PRATAP Y.S., S/O. LATE YOGESH, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS,
4.
SMT. PRIYANKA, D/O. LATE YOGESH, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS,
ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF NO.4/A, HALE MEDARAKERI NEAR PARK, SHIKARIPURA, SHIVAMOGGA-577427. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. H.S.PRASHANTH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
CANFIN HOMES LIMITED, NON-BANKING FINANCE COMPANY, INCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 1956, REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.29/1, SRI. M.N.KRISHNA RAO ROAD, BENGALURU-560004
Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25349 WP No. 16053 of 2026
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER, SRI. ARUN KUMAR J.M., …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K.V.LOKESH, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER Sri.H.S.Prashanth., counsel for the petitioners and Sri.K.V.Lokesh., counsel for the caveator / respondent No.1 appeared in person. After arguing the matter for sometime, counsel for the petitioners submits that a memo has been filed stating that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the petitioners submits that a conscious decision is taken about the withdrawal of the petition and if an order is passed the petitioners shall not seek review of the order or modification of the order. Counsel, therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25349 WP No. 16053 of 2026
The oral submission and the memo is placed on record. As the counsel on record has taken a conscious decision about the withdrawal of the petition, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, all pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of.
SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS/MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23