Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18225 (JHR)

UPENDRA YADAV v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4023/2026 · 2026-06-29

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:18936] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4023 of 2026 ------ Upendra Yadav, aged about 26 years, son of Radhe Shayam Yadav, resident of Village Bhadaibathan, P.O. and P.S. Manika, District Latehar (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.03 Dated-29-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Lesliganj P.S. Case No.134 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No.268 of 2026 (Sessions Trial No.70 of 2026) registered for the offences punishable under Section 126 (2), 115 (2), 109 (1), 352, 351 (2), 351 (3) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was member of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of the common object of the assembly, attempted to murder the informant. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. yet without putting him on Test Identification Parade as has been mentioned in para-2 of the Supplementary Affidavit, charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. It is next submitted that till now no witness has been examined. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 02.12.2025 as has been mentioned in para-14 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned I/C Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Palamau in connection with Lesliganj P.S. Case No.134 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No.268 of 2026 (Sessions Trial No.70 of 2026) with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-29.06.2026-Animesh/