[2026:RJ-JP:2735] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11487/2024 Shahrukh Khan S/o Nazeer Mohammad, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Phephana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director (Primary), Education Department, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Hanumangarh. 4. The District Elementary Education Officer, Hanumangarh. 5. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Ajmer. 6. The District Elementary Education Officer, Ajmer. 7. The Chief Block Education Officer, Panchayat Samiti Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh. 8. The Chief Block Education Officer, Panchayat Samiti Jawaja, District Ajmer. 9. The Principal And Peeo, Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Durgawas, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra K. Takar for Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG Mr. Ashutosh Udawat for Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 20/01/2026 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: [2026:RJ-JP:2735] (2 of 3) [CW-11487/2024] “i) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondents may kindly be directed to relieve the petitioner from Govt. Upper Primary School, Ramavas, Durgawas, Ajmer with LPC to join his new place posting i.e. Govt. Senior Secondary School, 99rd, Khetawali, District Hanumangarh. ii) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby and direct the respondent to protect the salary of the petitioner on the basis of LPC of the petitioner. Iii) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondent be directed to give same relief to the petitioner as has been given in the cases of Praveen Kumar Yadav Vs. State and Ors., SBCWP No.9500/2007, decided on 24.08.2016, Chandra Kala Saini Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. CW No.18703/20170) decided on 17.11.2017.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 17.12.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2049/2017 titled as Sajjad Ali Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for parties and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed in light of Sajjad Ali Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra) passed by this Court. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the [2026:RJ-JP:2735] (3 of 3) [CW-11487/2024] respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Sajjad Ali Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra), but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E- mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then same benefits be extended. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /353