[2026:RJ-JP:6512-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Misc. 2nd Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 1406/2025 In D.B. Criminal Appeal No.304/2023 Gorishankar Sahu Son Of Shri Kishan Lal Sahu, Resident Of House No. 283/04, Telipada Vyas Colony, P.s. Shastri Nagar, Jaipur At Present House No. 1264, Balanand Ji Ka Rasta, Chandpole Bazar, Police Station Nahargarh Road, Jaipur (Raj) (At Present In Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Pooja Sahu D/o Mahesh Sahu, Resident Of 135, Goverdhanpuri Galta Gate, Jaipur City North (Raj0 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Adv. with Ms. Kamini Pareek, Adv. For Respondent(s) For Complainant (s) : : Mr. Shriram Dhakad, Dy. GA with Mr. Vinod Sharma Mr. Aniroodh Mr. Mohd. Umar Farooq, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 11/02/2026 1. This second suspension of sentence application has been filed by the appellant alongwith the appeal. 2. Counsel for the appellant has annexed the certificate under Rule 311 (3) of the Rajasthan High Court Rules to the effect that during the trial, the appellant was on bail and the sentence of life imprisonment has been awarded to the appellant under Section 304-B IPC. Counsel further submits that the appellant has served the sentence for five years and minimum sentence prescribed for [2026:RJ-JP:6512-DB] (2 of 2) [SOSA-1406/2025] the offence under Section 304-B IPC as seven years and hearing of the appeal may take long time hence, the sentence awarded to the appellant may be suspended during the pendency of the appeal. 3. Learned Dy. Govt. Advocate assisted by counsel for the complainant has opposed the application for suspension of sentence. 4. We have heard counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case and also considering the fact that the appellant has been convicted for the offence under Section 304B IPC and he has served the sentence for more than five years and the hearing of appeal may take long time, We deem it just and proper to allow this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application. 6. In that view of the matter, this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application is allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to the applicant shall remain suspended during the pendency of the criminal appeal and the applicant be admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this Court on 10.03.2026 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so. 7. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax for necessary compliance. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J JYOTI /1