16-APPLN-34-2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 34 OF 2026 Rashidakhatun Salim Shaikh ...Applicant Versus Chand Muhammed Inamdar And Ors. ...Respondents _______________________________________________________________ Ms. S. D. Shaikh, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms. Ketaki Patil i/b Vijay Salunkhe, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. Mr. C. D. Mali, APP for the Respondent No. 4. PSI Vishal Jagtap, Lonand Police Station, is present. _______________________________________________________________ CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATE : 12th October, 2026. P.C. : 1. Heard Ms. S. D. Shaikh, learned Advocate for the Applicant, Ms. Ketaki Patil, learned Advocate for the Respondent No. 2 and Mr. C. D. Mali, learned APP for the Respondent No. 4 – State. 2. By the present Application, the Applicant has sought the following reliefs in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (h) :- a. Call for the record and proceedings of Anticipatory Bail Application No. 126/2026, 127/2026 And 131/2026 from the Ld. Sessions Court at Wai; b. Set aside the order dated 09.09.2026 passed by the Ld. Sessions Cour, Wai in Anticipatory Bail Application No. 126/2026, 127/2026 AND 131/2026 granting anticipatory bail to Respondents; c. Cancel and set aside the protection from arrest granted to Respondent No.1 to 3 and direct Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to surrender before the Investigating Officer/Court, as may Arjun 1 16-APPLN-34-2026.doc be directed; d. In the alternative, impose such additional conditions as may be necessary to ensure effective and unhindered investigation, including cooperation with the investigation and production of relevant documents; e. Direct the Investigating Officer to obtain and examine the original revenue records, file-notings, mutation proceedings, endorsements and other relevant official records; f. Direct that the relevant original official records be preserved and produced before the Investigating Officer/Court; g. Grant interim relief in terms of prayer clause (a) above; and h. Pass any other order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the interests of justice. 3. After this Application was heard for substantial time, when this Court indicated its disinclination, Ms. S. D. Shaikh, learned Advocate for the Applicant, on instructions from the Applicant, seeks leave to withdraw the present Application. 4. Ms. Ketaki Patil, learned Advocate for the Respondent No. 2 and Mr. C. D. Mali, learned APP for the Respondent No. 4 – State, do not oppose the request made by Ms. S. D. Shaikh, learned Advocate for the Applicant. 5. In view of the statement made by Ms. S. D. Shaikh, learned Advocate for the Applicant, leave is granted to withdraw the present Application. 6. Though this Application is being withdrawn, in the event there Arjun 2 16-APPLN-34-2026.doc is any breach of the condition of the Anticipatory Bail granted to the Respondents vide order dated 09.09.2026, in Bail Application Nos. 126 of 2026, 127 of 2026 and 131 of 2026, the Applicant is at liberty to apply to the Trial Court for cancellation of Bail. 7. If such Application is filed by the Applicant before the Trial Court, same be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law. 8. Criminal Application No. 34 of 2026 is disposed of as withdrawn. (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) Arjun 3 ARJUN KRISHNA RODGE Digitally signed by ARJUN KRISHNA RODGE Date: 2026.10.13 14:27:30 +0530