Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1822 (JHR)

Santosh Kumar Pandey v. The State Of Jharkhand

Cr.Rev./109/2017 · 2026-03-23

Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:8120 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 109 of 2017 -------- Santosh Kumar Pandey, son of Manrakhan Pandey, R/o-village Rahe, P.O., P.S.- Sonahatu, Dist.-Ranchi ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …… Opp. Party -------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA -------- For the Petitioner : None For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, A.P.P. -------- Order No. 12/ Dated: 23rd March, 2026 None appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, learned APP is present on behalf of the State. 2. This criminal revision has not been admitted due to bar of limitation. 3. It appears from the order-sheet dated 18.08.2025 that this criminal revision was twice dismissed for default. 4. Later on, Cr.M.P. No. 134 of 2026 was filed for restoration of the present criminal revision which was allowed and this criminal revision was restored vide order dated 04.02.2026. 5. Today, again the petitioner is not taking any serious efforts in prosecution of this revision which is also time-barred. 6. In view of the above facts, this criminal revision is dismissed again for default. (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) 23.03.2026 Basant Uploaded on 25/03/2026