RAMAN W/O RAJENDRA KUMAR JAKHAR D/O JASWANT SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/11658/2024 · 2026-01-12
Maneesh Sharma
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18219 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18219 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11658/2024 Raman W/o Rajendra Kumar Jakhar D/o Jaswant Singh, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village Seduka Bas, Post Napawali, Tehsil And District Neemkathana. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Collector, District Jhunjhunu.
2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Jhunjhunu.
3. Sub-Divisional Officer, Buhana District Jhunjhunu.
4. Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Singhana, District Jhunjhunu.
5. Chairman, Nagar Palika Singhana, District Jhunjhunu.
6. Sikar And Jhunjhunu Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari Sangh Ltd., National Highway No. 52, Jaipur Road, Palsana- Sikar Through Managing Director. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amitesh Rana for Mr. Rakesh Kumar Saini HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Order 12/01/2026
1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:
"It is, therefore, humbly prayed that your Lordships may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and (i) by an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondents may kindly be directed to provide the administration/police help to the petitioner for installing the Saras dairy booth at proposed place i.e. nearby shop of Shyam Ji, Old Bus Stand, Gram Panchayat Singhana (Jhunjhunu) to the petitioner (ii) by an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondents may further be directed to take legal action against the Present Chairman,
(2 of 3) [CW-11658/2024] Nagar Palika Singhana as well as the persons who are created obstruction in installing the Saras Dairy Booth of petitioner. (iii) Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be given in favour of the petitioner."
2. Though various prayers have been made in the writ petition,
learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions from his client, submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if; he is permitted to file a representation before respondent No.1 - State Of Rajasthan, Through Collector, District Jhunjhunu, encapsulating the grievances raised in the present writ petition within a period of two (02) weeks from today; and if a direction is issued to respondent No.1 - State Of Rajasthan, Through Collector, District Jhunjhunu, to decide the same in a time-bound manner.
3. Heard and considered the submissions made at bar.
4. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before respondent No.1 - State Of Rajasthan, Through Collector, District Jhunjhunu, within a period of two (02) weeks from today. Respondent No.1 - State Of Rajasthan, Through Collector, District Jhunjhunu, is directed to decide the said representation within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of filing of such representation by passing a speaking order, strictly in accordance with law.
5. It is made clear that the aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of the petitioner’s grievance. The same shall not be construed as an order to decide the representation in any particular manner.
(3 of 3) [CW-11658/2024]
6. The stay application and other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of, accordingly.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J KuD/11