MD. ABDUL HASIB ALIAS ADDUL HASIB ALIAS HASIB ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./1036/2026 · 2026-06-29
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18215 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18215 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:18946] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.1036 of 2026
------ Md. Abdul Haris @ Addul Hasib @ Haris Ansari, aged about 20 years, S/O- Md. Sarfaraj Ansari, R/O Village- Subdidih, P.O.+P.S.- Karmatar, District- Jamtara. .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, Addl.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Ranjit Kr. Tiwari, Adv.
------
Order No:-06 Dated:-29-06-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Karmatanr P.S. Case No. 106 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 140(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, has kidnapped the victim namely Ekram Ansari. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that Ekram Ansari has been examined as PW-4 and he has categorically stated in para-4, that he does not know the name of the persons who abducted him. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 05.11.2025 mentioned in para-22 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-03 of the supplementary affidavit. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State and the learned
counsel for the informant oppose the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Jamtara in connection with Karmatanr P.S. Case No. 106 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 29.06.2026 Saroj/