[2026:JHHC:18948] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4004 of 2026 ------ Makbul Ansari, Age- 41 years, Son of Rafique Ansari, resident of Village- Mundradih, P.O.- Chotki Kharagdiha, P.S. Begabad, District- Giridih. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sumit Prakash, Advocate Mr. Kumar Nitish, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Kumari Rashmi, Addl.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Mahesh Kr. Sinha (2), Adv. ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-29-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Bengabad P.S. Case No.57 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 109(1), 324(2) 351(1), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, attempted to murder Nasrul Ansari by assaulting him with an axe on his head causing grievous injury to him. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that for the self-same occurrence, the petitioner has first lodged Bengabad P.S. Case No. 56 of 2025 and as a counter-blast, this false case has been foisted against the petitioner. It is also submitted that the petitioner was first assaulted with an axe by Iqbal Ansari from the side of the informant on his head causing bleeding injury and to save himself, the petitioner and other members of his group retaliated the attack. It is further submitted that there was a free fight between the parties in respect of the land dispute and the petitioner had no intention to kill anyone rather he acted in his self-defence. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 07.04.2026 mentioned in para-1 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-10 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co- operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the informant oppose the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Giridih in connection with Bengabad P.S. Case No.57 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 29.06.2026 Saroj/